W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2005

[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:36:54 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502031333100.6666@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Daniel Brooks wrote:
> Ah, that makes sense. Perhaps a single sentance that states that they 
> are counted as two form controls just like is described elsewhere (with 
> a reference), but that they are otherwise skipped.

The spec says:

| For image controls, instead of using the name given by the name 
| attribute, the field's name is checked against two names, the first 
| being the value of the name attribute with the string .x appended to it, 
| and the second being the same but with .y appended instead. Thus image 
| controls are handled as if they were two controls.
| If the identified form control is a file upload control, a push button 
| control, or an image control, then the field element is now skipped.

> Ah, it's in the third paragraph, but now that I read it again I see that 
> it says 'from script', not 'form script', so I guess it's ok, but 'for a 
> script' or 'for scripts' would be easier to read. The whole sentance is 
> "There is no way from script to detect this situation because that would 
> open the way for some privacy or security leaks."


Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2005 05:36:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:21 UTC