W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2005

[whatwg] [WA1] The profile Attribute

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:13:25 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504180900520.7599@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> 
> Is that a real problem or a theoretical problem? What are the chances 
> that someone specifying rel='nofollow' or rel='license' in a way 
> incompatible with the common usage? The rel attribute has existed for 
> years. Are there examples of name conflicts? Are the conflicts so 
> serious that the benefit of profiles outweighs the cruftiness? It seems 
> to me profiles are solving a problem we are not having.

The most common names would be incorporated into the spec itself, thus 
reducing the need for profiles.

Microformats are becoming more popular though, and so I think we should at 
least handle the potential problems.


> > That's a fair point, but implementing XFN for user agent B might be 
> > simply a matter of dereferencing the profile URI,
> 
> Single point of failure. Imagine every UA whacking w3.org for DTDs. 
> Won't be implemented.

Not for browsers, but for conformance checkers, and for data crawlers, it 
would make sense.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 18 April 2005 02:13:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:22 UTC