Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > >>> Then would you want different markup for book titles, movie titles, >>> play titles, song titles, etc? Or would you just expect the script >>> to search IMDB for anything marked up with <cite>? >> >> Again, I don't really know. I could see a use case for a "type" >> attribute (as was suggested earlier in this thread), but that seems >> like a slippery slope. Suggestions? > > If we go with something like a TYPE attribute, I hope we can give it a > better name. However, hiding semantics inside the value of an attribute > is a poor markup design in humble opinion. (Although it also has some > advantages.) It's subclassing: the general is sufficient, the specific better. Many markup languages use the design, and in this case, I think it's necessary. ~fantasaiReceived on Sunday, 17 April 2005 13:56:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:47:31 GMT