W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2005

[whatwg] [WA1] lang and xml:lang

From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:09:21 +0200
Message-ID: <4262A651.2060804@annevankesteren.nl>
Ian Hickson wrote:
>> Is there any reason for not making that "must not"?  The only
>> reason someone would ever have for using lang instead of xml:lang
>> in XHTML is when serving it as text/html, which is strictly
>> forbidden in this version.  It should be stated that lang is for
>> HTML only and xml:lang is for X(HT)ML only.
> 
> Done.
> 
> 
>> I think the heading for the attribute defintion should be updated
>> to include xml:lang as well.
> 
> Done.

I assume we are going to do something similar for 'xml:id' when that 
becomes REC? Or do the issues with regard to type ID need to be sorted 
out first?


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Sunday, 17 April 2005 11:09:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:22 UTC