W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2005

[whatwg] HTML5: New link-types regarding guideline 2.4 in WCAG 2.0

From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:01:14 +0200
Message-ID: <425E699A.1060107@annevankesteren.nl>
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> With comments and feed, it should indicate a "resource used as a 
> syndication format containing user contributed comments".  Perhaps the 
> sentence you cited above could be clarified to reflect this better.

Using two link values gives the link two relations, not one.


> I somewhat agree with this, although it seems that it is just the 
> definition of alternate that is poorly worded.  If it were defined more 
> like this, alternate stylesheet would be more appropriate:
> 
>   Designates substitute versions for the document in which the link
>   occurs or, when used in conjuntion with another link type, an
>   alternate version of the resource type indicated.
> 
> (that definition is not perfect, but I think you'll understand what its 
> supposed to mean anyway)

I do, but I'm not sure if it would be correct.


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2005 06:01:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:22 UTC