W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2005

[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 Feedback

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:03:53 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504131102070.9@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
> 
> I cannot agree. We should not mix typographical presentation for 
> presentation sake and typographical presentation for semantic reason. 
> While it may be not a big deal in chemistry, it is not so in math.

This may be a good way of putting it in the spec: "typographical 
conventions with specific meanings (as opposed to typographical 
presentation for presentation's sake)".

> Or is E=mc2 same as E=mc<sup>2</sup>?
> Do log4nm and log<sub>4</sub>n<sup>m</sup> differ?

Good examples, I'll use this in the spec (assuming that's ok with you!).

Thanks,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 04:03:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:22 UTC