- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:48:29 +0200
Ian Hickson wrote: > This doesn't stop conformance checker implements from writing DTDs of > their own and then placing them in their SGML catalog so that the HTML5 > DOCTYPE triggers that DTD, though. The point is that different conformance > checker vendors should be able to write their own DTD for HTML5 to > complement the rest of the conformance checking process. As the mix > between DTD-based and other checking will probably be vendor-dependent, I > don't see why we'd want to elevate any particular DTD to official status. Entities. Or is that problem going to be solved by: "use UTF-8"? (Which would be something I wouldn't disagree with, although for mathematical symbols it might be a pain to enter them.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 03:48:29 UTC