W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > September 2004

[whatwg] RE: Degrading of web applications

From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 08:14:47 +0100
Message-ID: <851c8d3104090900147f89569a@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:09:39 +0930, Chris Were <chris.were at gmail.com> wrote:
>>what you don't explain though is why that
>> model requires no degradation - what's the difference?
> Are you refering to future or past degradation? The model I mentioned
> doesn't require past degradation, but the future WHATWG specification
> definately requires degradation to continue supporting what is
> currently possible.

could you explain more what you mean by future and past degradation? 
This hasn't really made anything clear I'm afraid, but I think you're
probably right that we're talking at crossed purposes..

Received on Thursday, 9 September 2004 00:14:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:19 UTC