W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2004

[whatwg] refer to 'Web Applications 1.0' instead of 'Web Apps 1.0'

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:04:51 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411170103290.15515@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004, dolphinling wrote:
> > >
> > > I guess 'Web Apps' was chosen because the title of the specification 
> > > used to be longer (Web Application Markup Language or something 
> > > similar), but no the specification is called 'Web Applications', 
> > > similar to the names of the other specifications, 'Web Forms' and 
> > > 'Web Controls' I think the name should be written full out when a 
> > > reference is made.
> > 
> > Oops, yeah, that was a mistake. Let me know if you find any others.
> 
> From Google:
> 
> The front page (Anne mentioned this already)
> Two places on http://whatwg.org/charter
> Two places on http://whatwg.org/specs/web-controls/current-work/
> Once on http://whatwg.org/news/start

Fixed some of the above. Didn't change the news page since that's an 
archive, and changing that seems revisionist.


> Other than that only the url http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/* , which 
> I assume we want to keep.

Yeah, that seems fine.

Thanks,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2004 17:04:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:20 UTC