- From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:25:38 +0100
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 18:44:29 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Jim Ley wrote: > > > > Why is the clear sign of having a listener for the event not sufficient? > > What is the basic difference. > > It can be *significantly* more complicated to tell if the element has > event listeners than to tell if it has an attribute, unfortunately. Could you address the other points About re-serialisation of the DOM leading to something radically different from what was intended (the attribute should only be there if there was also an event listener after a re-serialisation and parse it wouldn't be there.) I realise you have a large job Ian going through all these comments, but you often miss out some element of each post, I really do think an issue tracker is important. Jim.
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:25:38 UTC