- From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 13:24:50 +0100
On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 20:06:11 -0400, Matthew Raymond <mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote: > Jim Ley wrote: > > In the resolved WONTFIX sense perhaps? > > > > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97284 > > Perhaps you should read closer: It says RESOLVED WONTFIX, and whilst it's obvious that bugzilla has many flaws - surely RESOLVED DUPLICATE newbug, or INVALID would be an appropriate way to close the bug, saying they WONTFIX the feature request says that. Bug Tracking isn't rocket science. > "However, most of the talented hackers I know dislike bugspam intensely, > so I'm inclined to close this bug, open another one, and revoke bugzilla > access from anyone who spams that bug. How's that for vending a clue, hmm?" It's rather a depressing state of affairs all round. > They haven't closed the issue. They've closed the bug. > You may disagree with they way they're handling the spam in this > bug, but don't misrepresent what's going on here. Mozilla is not opposed > to addressing this bug. They're just sick of the spam. So where's the new bug? Looks like the feature's still closed to me. Jim.
Received on Sunday, 4 July 2004 05:24:50 UTC