Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Matthew Raymond wrote: [My argument against the having no initial radio buttons selected in a radio group snipped.] > > In theory, I agree with you. However, UAs can't do what you ask for. > Whenever a vendor has tried implementing this, they have gotten swamped > with requests to change it back to the IE-compatible behaviour. Sites > depend on this behaviour, and break without it. > > This is one of those cases where our hands are tied by legacy content. Oh, I agree that for backwards compatibility sake, we need to support radio groups with no initial values. However, I see little reason not to recommend default radio buttons in either WF2 or WA1. (Probably the former.) That said, I really wish there were a way to depreciate the lack of a default, but the method of doing so escapes me at the moment.Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2004 00:29:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:47:30 GMT