- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 08:12:48 +0200
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
Based on the discssion on the list, and the discussion at the virtual interim of the WG, the chairs conclude that there is consensus to remove the "overconstrained" event from the specification. Harald, for the chairs. On 4/4/19 10:15 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > A discussion between developers [1] has surfaced that: > > a) After five years in the spec, no browser has implemented > "onoverconstrained" > > b) None of the implementors have found a realistic way to test > "onoverconstrained", even if implemented > > c) Very few developers have said that "onoverconstrained" is critical to > their use cases. > > Given those observations, the chairs are sending out a call for > consensus on removing "ononverconstrained" from the mediacapture-main spec. > > If this achieves consensus, we will merge the PR for removing > "onoverconstrained" [2] after suitable review. > > Please reply to this message, without changing the subject line, with > either: > > * I support removing "onoverconstrained" > > * I oppose removing "onoverconstrained" > > and, if applicable, reasons why. > > If you wish to reply to a response to this message in order to state > your position, remember to explictly include your own position in your > message. > > If you wish to follow up on the thread for any other reason, please > change the subject, so that it is possible to tell responses from > discussion of other matters. > > Harald, for the chairs > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/573 > > [2] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/pull/576 > -- Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2019 06:13:14 UTC