Re: Call for adoption - use case for "Trusted application, untrusted intermediary"

I support adoption of this new use case.

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:00 AM Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
wrote:

>
>
> * From the Lyon summary of actions: “The WG adopts the E2E use case where
> we trust the application, but not the relay. (to be verified on the list)”
> The question is whether we should include in our “NV Scenarios” document
> the scenario currently described in
> https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-nv-use-cases/#securecommunications*
> <https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-nv-use-cases/#securecommunications*> - where
> the application (Web page) is fully trusted, but uses a relay service that
> should not be able to decode the transmitted media. The consensus in the
> meeting in Lyon was that this use case should be included; this call serves
> to verify that consensus on the list. Unless objections are raised and
> verified to be widely held in the discussion, the chairs will assume that
> the WG has consensus to include this use case. If you object to this
> document being adopted, please say so to the list before or on Wednesday,
> November 28. Harald, for the chairs *
>