- From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:03:16 +0100
- To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
- Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 24/01/2018 22:54, Michael Tuexen wrote: >> On 24. Jan 2018, at 18:59, Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 24/01/2018 18:50, Michael Tuexen wrote: >>> Are you referring to a non-congestion controlled way of sending unordered, unreliable datagrams? >>> You can right now use and unordered delivery, limit the number of retransmissions to 0 and >>> get a congestion controlled unordered unreliable datagram service... >> Except that it can be buffered, chunked, there is no way of knowing the MTU and last time I checked didn't work as expected on any browser.. ;) > Since it does fragmentation for you, there is no need to know the MTU. The buffering is due to > flow and congestion control. So you want a data channel that does not have any kind of flow and > congestion control? > > What did not work as you expect? It was a while since I checked it, so I just tested latest chrome and indeed it works ok now, so ignore this point and thank you for correcting me! Sergio
Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2018 22:03:39 UTC