Re: Poll: Location and nature of "V2 kickoff" WG meeting

TBH, I'm rather surprised that we're talking about kicking off WebRTC V2
We're just barely at the point where we can see the end of WebRTC V1 in
sight

1. I would probably show up in NA, but I doubt in Stockholm

2. I prefer a virtual meeting and whether i will show up at a physical one
depends on where it is

-Ekr


On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:12 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
wrote:

> Regarding the f2f meeting in June, where a main topic would be "how do
> we get started with NV", it seems that the days of June 19-20 is the
> best selection [1].
>
> At yesterday's VI meeting it was however decided that we should
> investigate two things:
>
> Q1: Would you prefer to meet in north America over the proposed location
> (Stockholm)? Would it make a difference regarding your possibility to
> attend in person?
>
> If you answer one of the below, it will make tallying easier for us:
>
> - I'll show up in Stockholm but not in North America
> - I'll show up in North America but not in Stockholm
> - I'll show up in either place
> - I won't show up physically no matter where you hold it
>
>
> Q2: Should we instead go for a virtual meeting, e.g. using WebEx, to
> maximize participation? We think if we do this we should shorten the
> sessions to 3 - 4 hours per day since virtual meetings can be a bit more
> exhausting.
>
> If you answer one of the below, it will make tallying easier for us:
>
> - I prefer a physical meeting (and will come)
> - I prefer a virtual meeting, but will show up on a physical one
> - I prefer a virtual meeting, and won't show up on a physical one
> - I won't attend either a physical or a virtual meeting, but am
> responding anyway
>
>
> Let us know latest by Friday next week (April 20) what you think.
>
> Harald, for the chairs
>
> --
> Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
>
>
>