Re: Suggested resolution of Issue 849: Specify an AllowUnverifiedMedia RTCConfiguration property from Martin Thomson on 2017-05-04 (public-webrtc@w3.org from May 2017)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 12:32:55 +1000
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Cc: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, Tim Panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVkCM-QSF1rdNQuDdjj=nLt=2U7WP=rKiAtRhG2DVVJpA@mail.gmail.com>

On 4 May 2017 at 12:26, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hmm .. not sure that is the case depending on what you assume about security of signaling.

The standard assumption: it's not confidential, but it has integrity.
That is, it contains a true representation of the offer and answer
generated by the parties that are supposed to be in the call.

> I am totally fine with no security till you get the answer

That helps.  And I fully appreciate how much of a big deal the
underlying use case is.  But let's chat.

Received on Thursday, 4 May 2017 02:33:29 UTC