Re: Virtual Face to Face

Hi,

If it helps, we could easily create a room for you in rabbit that allows a lot of people.

We do support audio + video + screencast and use WebRTC.
Currently we limit it to 16 people for our consumer product, but happy to increase the limit for you.

Check it out and let me know : https://rabb.it.

Thanks,

Philippe Clavel
CTO & Founder
Rabbit


On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Peter Thatcher wrote:

> My experience using webex for audio calls makes me think it's even more of a pain.  My experience with it has been very poor. 
> 
> If there's a system we can use that's large-scale audio + screencast, that would be better than webex, but actually uses WebRTC so I could just go to a webpage instead of installing something or calling in via PSTN and punching numbers, that would be much better.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com (mailto:ekr@rtfm.com)> wrote:
> > This seems like a not-great idea. My experience with large-scale video conferences is that they are unreliable and generally a PITA. Let's just
> > do an audio call if we are doing a virtual interim
> > 
> > -Ekr
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com (mailto:erik@hookflash.com)> wrote:
> > > The chairs are giving some thought to having a Virtual F2F sometime in January, where we would be using a online tool for video conferencing, screen sharing and the like.
> > > 
> > > The motivation here stems from rising costs in travel and growing interest from some members to try and at least attempt to have some of the meetings via Virtual F2F / Video conference.
> > > 
> > > The chairs would be interested in hearing feedback from our members with regards to timing, rough agenda and the concept in general.
> > > 
> > > Erik, for the chairs.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hookflash (http://hookflash.com/) | m 1.604.562.8647 (tel:1.604.562.8647) | erik@hookflash.com (mailto:erik@hookflash.com) | @elagerway (http://twitter.com/elagerway)
> > 
>