Re: API points for ICE/DTLS warmup from Iñaki Baz Castillo on 2015-07-25 (public-webrtc@w3.org from July 2015)

From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 18:51:41 +0200
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CALiegfn5UAFQNRK-c=fasx2PXYUfyiW5K7hqCEnkmfjyQwXC8g@mail.gmail.com>

2015-07-24 13:18 GMT+02:00 Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>:
> I think:
>
> B > A, because an RtpSender without a track seems cleaner than a dummy
> track. But I could live with A.
>
> D > C, because we don't have to add anything.  I think we shouldn't add
> RtpReceiver.active.
>
> F > E, because we don't have to add anything.  I think that even if we add
> RtpReceiver.active, it should not cause an SDP renegotiation, just like
> RtpSender.setParameters doesn't.


Agreed on all the points.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

Received on Saturday, 25 July 2015 16:52:28 UTC