Re: ReplaceTrack and track.id (Re: ReplaceTrack - need to evaluate alternatives) from Martin Thomson on 2015-04-15 (public-webrtc@w3.org from April 2015)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:49:13 -0700
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU7=hP3PQnwTZA-KFks5i3=FegEVsif78zerQr6x1tZzg@mail.gmail.com>

On 15 April 2015 at 14:41, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:
> There just one issue I'm not sure what to do about:  if we use MID instead
> of MSID, how do we signal the synchronization groups (ie the MediaStreams
> the MediaStreamTracks are supposed to go in).

Adam and I had a group ID proposal that was used for the partial
offer-answer proposal.  Attach that to the LS group, perhaps.

BTW, immutability > mutability every time.  If we can settle on using
mid, then this is fine.  I would prefer if the mid value were chosen
by the browser though.

Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 21:49:41 UTC