- From: Singh Varun <varun.singh@aalto.fi>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:57:12 +0000
- To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Hi Stefan, > On 27 Nov 2014, at 14:37, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > just noted in [1] that a video orientation RTP header extension seem to > be assumed. > > Has it ever been discussed what that would mean in the application > space? I.e. should it transfer to a track property, should it rotate the I don’t remember it being discussed, but I have only recently started following the list actively. > view shown by the video element automatically (and in that case: how > would that interact with CSS rotations), or something else? True, there should be some discussion somewhere in the document to clarify what is the expected behaviour. It seems a bit odd to read a property on the RTP header extension to do this in JS. I would imagine that the UA would automatically do this. > Sorry if I missed the discussion, but I don't recollect we talked about > this. > > Stefan > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2014Nov/0078.html > — http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun
Received on Friday, 28 November 2014 11:57:41 UTC