- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 06:06:33 +0000
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25497
--- Comment #1 from Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> ---
Summary from Justin Uberti, May 8:
Trying to bring this discussion to a conclusion... I sense consensus around the
following:
- General concept of doohickeys, i.e. RTCRtpSender, RTPRtpReceiver.
- addTrack(track, streamId)/removeTrack and onaddtrack.
- Implicit cloning never occurs. This means that if you want to add a track
twice to a PC, you need to first clone it.
More discussion is still needed on:
- RTCRtpEncodingParams
- RTCDtlsTransport
Therefore I would like to advance the initial, uncontroversial parts of this
proposal, i.e. what I describe below. We can then discuss the exact nature of
the encodings and transport objects separately on the list, and at the interim
meeting.
// the "send" doohickey
interface RTCRtpSender {
 readonly attribute MediaStreamTrack track;
};
// the "receive" doohickey
interface RTCRtpReceiver {
 readonly attribute MediaStreamTrack track;
};
// parameter to the onaddtrack event
interface AddTrackEvent : Event {
 readonly attribute RtpReceiver receiver;
 readonly attribute MediaStreamTrack track;
 readonly attribute MediaStream stream;
};
partial interface RTCPeerConnection {
// because a track can be part of multiple streams, the id parameter
 // indicates which particular stream should be referenced in signaling
 RTCRtpSender addTrack(track, streamId);  // replaces addStream; fails if
|track| has already been added                               
 void removeTrack(RTCRtpSender);  // replaces removeStream
 sequence<RTCRtpSender> getSenders();
 sequence<RTCRtpReceiver> getReceivers();
 EventHandler onaddtrack;  // replaces onaddstream; event object is
RemoteTrackEvent.
                                        // note that onremovestream is not
needed, since tracks are 'removed'
                                        // simply by progressing to the ENDED
state
};
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2014 06:06:34 UTC