- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 20:35:17 +0100
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 03/27/2014 06:04 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 27 March 2014 03:38, Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: >> No. You could continue to map the channel messages byte-by-byte >> on SCTP messages. But you would introduce some control message >> (also in SCTP DATA chunks) which you would send reliably and >> put in whatever information is needed. For me this looks pretty simple... > I think that this might be less than ideal. Unless you like buffering > an entire BDP worth of data when the application starts applying back > pressure. > BDP? Sorry, acronym cache miss. Besides, we've already accepted that the application can get data handed to it in 1-Gbyte chunks. That camel was larger than not doing backpressure...
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 19:35:46 UTC