- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:48:43 -0700
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- Cc: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 28 April 2014 23:11, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote: > The issue could still exist if you do addTrack(T, S) and then later > S.removeStream(T). We might prefer taking the stream directly for > syntactical reasons, but I don't think it avoids the core issue. That's fine; the stream configuration on the receiving end always lags the configuration at the sending end. I'm just not convinced that we need a way to specify identifiers in this way, Harald's speculation on rehydration notwithstanding.
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2014 16:49:10 UTC