Re: gUM's optional constraints algorithm penalizes user-choice chasing best-match for webpage from Dominique Hazael-Massieux on 2013-09-02 (public-webrtc@w3.org from September 2013)

From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 11:52:37 +0200
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
Message-ID: <1378115557.31637.41.camel@cumulustier>

Le lundi 02 septembre 2013 à 11:39 +0200, Harald Alvestrand a écrit :
> Dom, I can't parse that sentence in the context of the current algorithm.
> [...]

Hmm... You're right, I think I was misreading the current algorithm;
that said, while that part of the argument is invalid, I still think
leaving more choice to the user for things that are optional is better
practice for a Web browser, so I would still side on not constraining
what the browser does with optional constraints.

Dom

Received on Monday, 2 September 2013 09:52:51 UTC