W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > October 2013

Re: Wiki update (Re: stats api webidl implementers feedback)

From: Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:27:16 +0300
Message-ID: <CAEbPqrxrs+9U8rYL7c6d6vr-BUw-wu2YMsuXqoyoQVN8uuWDYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, "Rachel Huang(yihong)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>, Ron Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Hi Harald,

In http://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/Stats, I notice that
does not have fractional loss, was it removed and put some place else?

Another clarification: is the RTCInboundRTPStreamStats calculated
every time the stats API
is called or does it return value from the last RTCP RR?

Lastly, we would like  to get comments on additional statistics for
RTCInboundRTPStreamStats [1]
We make a recommendation for 7 additional metrics that can be used to
measure goodput,
quality of service. Additionally, if anyone wants to review the whole
set of metrics available
in RTCP XRs, see [2].

Thanks very much, feedback is appreciated.

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-singh-xrblock-webrtc-additional-stats-01
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huang-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-02

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Harald Alvestrand
<harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> I've (finally) made the correction to DOMHighResTimeStamp.
> I also removed firs (because I'm unsure if that's what we want to count) and
> volume (because I don't think it's a well defined metric), and moved
> priority from candidatepair to candidate, per discussion.
> On 10/24/2013 07:12 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
> Great thanks! - long long for bytes makes sense. I can still get it in for
> FF27 (Monday).
> A couple of nits:
>>     DOMHiResTimeStamp timestamp;
> I think you mean DOMHighResTimeStamp right?
>>   unsigned long firs;
> I'm not sure what this is.
> .: Jan-Ivar :.
> On 10/24/13 2:21 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> I've updated http://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/Stats with most of the
> suggestions, and a few other fiddles. It should also be easy (easier?) now
> to generate WebIDL from the source; just take the content of all the <pre>
> sections.
> I also made all the byte counters "long long"; we've found that 32-bit byte
> counters overflow rapidly.
> Thanks very much for the feedback!

Received on Friday, 25 October 2013 08:40:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:51 UTC