Re: stats api webidl implementers feedback

On 24 October 2013 12:41, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> The 64-bit version seems to be here:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5245#page-113
>
> Perhaps it's simplest to represent this as a 31-bit priority on the
> candidate; anyone who wants to compute the 64-bit value can easily do so
> from the 2 candidates.

Right.  The transformation from candidate priorities to candidate pair
priorities is canonical, so no strong need to expose it as a separate
property.  In general, derived properties can be dropped.

Received on Thursday, 24 October 2013 20:11:46 UTC