- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:31:45 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
- CC: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 2013-11-14 00:57, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 13 November 2013 14:39, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote: >> what does it like for something that is sendrecv stream. > > a=sendrecv is an SDP construct. I'd imagine that there would be a > sender and a receiver that get all chummy in SDP, but to force > chumminess upon them would be unnatural. It would be nice to move the createDTMFSender() method to the DooHickey. It wouldn't require an argument anymore. /Adam
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 14:32:10 UTC