- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:50:30 +0200
- To: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
- CC: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 2013-06-19 18:28, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: > On 6/19/13 2:47 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: >> With a processing state, the second call would always fail. > > Agreed. > >> That's deterministic and observable from JS (compared to a queue in >> the background). > > The current approach is also deterministic, as I showed. > The current approach is also observable from JS because the failure > callback is called. In fact with Futures/Promises, there's little > difference. With Future/Promises you practically build the operations queue in your application; that's rather nice and what I think is desirable. /Adam
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 08:50:53 UTC