- From: Rob Manson <roBman@mob-labs.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 16:24:36 +1000
- To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Thanks Stefan. Yep...will do. roBman On 21/07/13 15:46, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: > Rob, > > Peter T has a spreadsheet at > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuaKXw3SkHMSdHlZdV9RN0xSWFhybVl4anJLRkVPV0E#gid=1 > collecting the experiences made when using the WebRTC APIs. Could you > enter what you have learned? The more people that contribute the better. > > Stefan > > On 7/21/13 1:08 AM, Rob Manson wrote: >> +1 >> >> As a web developer that's spent a lot of time experimenting with the >> currently specified version of the WebRTC related APIs and that's been >> following the mailing list debates closely this really does seem like >> the best resolution. >> >> It provides a more extensible and flexible architecture that can evolve >> at "web developer speed" not "aligned browser release speed". And at >> this speed it will also be less fragile. >> >> It provides a clear separation of concerns so people can use SDP where >> they want, but not everyone is restricted by the timelines of other WGs >> that are required to evolve SDP. >> >> And it would enable even more experimentation and future facing >> development too. >> >> >> Also, in terms of timing I think getting this right is more important >> than the current commitment to a deadline. >> >> This is from the perspective of a web developer that has gone to all the >> effort of just finishing a book on "Getting started with WebRTC" using >> the existing API and who is also working on several commercial projects >> based on the current API. >> >> So if anyone should be promoting "just get the first version out" then >> it should be someone in my position. But I think you really will find >> that most web developers would rather we got this abstraction right >> first so we can avoid all of the extra support issues and application >> re-work that will be required down the track if we don't. >> >> roBman >> >> >> On 20/07/13 23:51, Iņaki Baz Castillo wrote: >>> Let W3C experts to define a good JS API for WebRTC (with no SDP), let >>> MMUSIC WG to define a SDP format for WebRTC, and then let JavaScript SIP >>> experts to build JS libraries on top of it to play the SDP game, and we >>> all will be happy. And telcos will be much more happy than they think. >>> Let's get rid of all the SDP O/A stuff in the browser. The browser is >>> not a phone and "fixed logic + fixed code" does not work here. >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Sunday, 21 July 2013 06:25:35 UTC