Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface from Cullen Jennings on 2013-07-20 (public-webrtc@w3.org from July 2013)

From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:24:55 -0700
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Cc: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>, "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3C837643-5DB1-4192-8DA3-6D999E867E77@iii.ca>

On Jul 19, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> 2013/7/19 Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>:
>> Folks wanted to sort out how mindless works fist before getting to theses smaller details
> 
> Hi Cullen,
> 
> All these "smaller details" are in fact issues and problems we don't
> need. Issues not needed at all in WebRTC, issues that WebRTC
> developers and vendors should NOT care about. If those "smaller
> details" do exist is due the mandate of SDP. And all the time the WG
> (or WGs) will spent "fixing/defining" them is just wasted time, since
> nothing useful is being done for WebRTC by "defining" those "minor
> details".
> 
> Regards.
> 


Well lets prioritize fixing them. Which ones are causing interoperability problems between browsers?

Received on Saturday, 20 July 2013 01:25:07 UTC