- From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:06:28 -0500
- To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
- CC: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>, "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 7/19/13 13:47, Peter Thatcher wrote: > I think this is the real issue at hand: You value legacy interop more > than a usable API. This. *This* is why I've told you that you're misunderstanding everything. Don't take offense, just go back and read more carefully. I never said anything that implied that legacy interop is more valuable than a usable API. It's a nice strawman for you to build up and tear down, but you are arguing with a fictional character who is not me when you do so. What I'm trying to point out is that these goals are not at odds with each other. Your statement above implies that you have taken it as given that we can't do both -- that there is a tradeoff here to be made. If you take that as a fundamental principle, then I can see how nothing I say makes any sense. But they're not mutually exclusive goals. Keep that in mind, and go back to re-read what I've written. /a
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 19:07:06 UTC