Re: Locus of API discussion

2013/7/9 Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>:
> You'll note that we are talking about the *public* webrtc list; there should
> be no filter to participation on that list.

Hi Ted,

What I understand from the mail of cowwoc is that it would be really
sad if we move the API discussion to public-webrtc, get the same or
worse level of attention, and in the meanwhile PlanA vs PlanB and
draft-rtcweb-xxx-more-workarounds-for-sdp continue in IETF RTCWEB
maillist as if nobody was complaining about current API/design.

Of course, it is better to discuss about it in a single place, so
thanks a lot for pointing us to the appropriate maillist.

Best regards.


--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 17:05:43 UTC