W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2013

RE: VS: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers

From: Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku) <snandaku@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 23:51:44 +0000
To: Iņaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, Robin Raymond <robin@hookflash.com>, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Message-ID: <37D91FC30D69DE43B61E5EEADD959F1807D21E32@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>

From: Iņaki Baz Castillo [ibc@aliax.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 4:37 PM
To: Ted Hardie
Cc: Christer Holmberg; cowwoc; Robin Raymond; Roman Shpount; Adam Bergkvist; piranna@gmail.com; public-webrtc@w3.org; Eric Rescorla
Subject: Re: VS: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers

2013/7/3 Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>:
> The question we're trying to answer is:
> How do peers agree on the set of data sources to be exchanged, send them to
> each other via a browser, and understand how to associate the received flows
> with application behaviour?

Hi Ted, I replied to this in my mails yesterday:

Instead of passing SDP between JS and WebRC stack, use a real JS
Object based API.
Instead of sending an opaque SDP blob in-the-wire send the media info
in any custom format designed by the website developer. Anyone is fine
if the receiver JS can de-serialize/decode/parse it, construct the
requires JS Object(s) with it, and pass it to the WebRTC stack via a

just curious, how does the one define the agreed upon structure to understand the semantics of the data stored in such a  data structure passed from one end-point to the another ... 

Iņaki Baz Castillo
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 23:52:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:34 UTC