- From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:27:20 +0200
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
2013/4/19 Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>: >> Anyhow, this concept of "putting on hold" is just a "SIP application" >> (no idea whether Jingle also uses it), and it is irrelevant. > > > If "putting on hold" is irrelevant, should we close the bug as irrelevant, > and instead ask for specific bugs that request specific behaviour? I did not mean that "putting on hold" is irrelevant, but that it is just an application usage. An application usage that, currently, it is not feasible with the API provided by WebRTC. I agree that we should specify exact issues and requests for making WebRTC API flexible enough to implement such an application. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 15:28:11 UTC