RE: Re: Feedback on the PeerConnection API

I received some of my old posts from the list. Does anybody else have the same problem?

Thanks.
Li

From: Li Li [mailto:Li.NJ.Li@huawei.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 12:37 PM
To: public-webrtc@w3.org
Subject: Re: Feedback on the PeerConnection API

> I agree, a way to not use any STUN or TURN server should be specified.

You should be able to just not provide servers.

I think we need to distinguish two cases even without any STUN/TURN server: 1) do ICE without it; 2) don't do ICE at all.

In case 1), I think the ICE agent will still perform host candidate gathering and checking (STUN Bind Request/Response) even without other types of candidates found from the servers.
In case 2), the ICE agent is disabled and no ICE messages are exchanged between peers before RTP - which could be useful if the peer doesn't support ICE.

Thanks.
Li