Re: API scope from Stefan Hakansson LK on 2012-02-07 (public-webrtc@w3.org from February 2012)

From: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 09:02:09 +0100
To: public-webrtc@w3.org
Message-ID: <4F30DA81.2000600@ericsson.com>

On 02/07/2012 12:20 AM, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote:
> Similarly, it was argued at the F2F that ROAP was a subset of JSEP
> (though if Cullen is right and switching codecs causes a period where
> the receiver can't process what the sender is sending with JSEP, but not
> with ROAP, I don't see how that can be true), but I think it would have
> been hard to start with one and get to the other without working it out
> first. Doing that may in fact be an interesting exercise (in terms of
> getting more formalized semantics for things like setRemoteDescription()
> before moving on to those that also require modifying the SDP passed to
> setLocalDescription(), and separating out exactly what each one buys us
> in terms of our use-cases).

Tim, could you elaborate a bit more on your proposal? I think it sounds 
interesting, but want to understand more.

Stefan

Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 08:05:43 UTC