W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > August 2012

Re: Proposed update of Milestones

From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:50:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPnpe-_wCZAW7VeNYa87cOrFUCaqhjUDDdKL5C-vt44gw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org
On 8/17/12, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 08:17 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>> On 16 August 2012 10:45, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>>> On 08/16/2012 02:42 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>>>> On 14 August 2012 06:33, Stefan Hakansson LK
>>>> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>>>> Proposed milestones:
>>>>> FPWD: Q3 2011 (MS already passed, met in Q4 2011)
>>>>> LC: January 2013
>>>>> CR: March 2013
>>>>> PR: Q2 2013
>>>>> Rec: Q3 2012.
>>>> These are aggressive.  Have the chairs discussed splitting the work
>>>> into smaller, more achievable portions so that more important items
>>>> could be completed ahead of other lower priority items?
>>> We think we have something close to the minimum set necessary to achieve
>>> our
>>> use cases now. If there are candidates for elimination that do not need
>>> elimination of use cases, or if there are specific use cases that you
>>> don't
>>> think we should consider for V1, please speak up.
>> That presumes that V1 is an atom.  That's a pretty big atom.
> V1 ("the first release") is an atom, in the sense that there can only be
> one.
>>
>> Media and data channel seem readily separable.  I'm not sure where we
>> stand with the IdP stuff, but that would be another such piece.
>> Apologies to my friends at Mozilla, who I know are deeply invested in
>> these particular features, but I'm sure we will hear from them if my
>> assessment on maturity is off-base.
> Both of these features are also missing from the present Chrome release.
> I don't think the full IdP stuff can make V1; it's unclear to me if an
> interface can be defined that allows it to be specified separately and
> used by V1 implementations if present.

The current Firefox implementation has prototype implementations
of both of these features.

I will be providing a proposed interface for the IdP stuff shortly
(it will be relatively similar to what was in my individual IETF
I-D).

-Ekr
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 15:51:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 17 August 2012 15:51:14 GMT