Re: Additional requirement - audio-only communication

On 9/6/11 2:25 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> The Accept header is also a privacy violation, which is in part why 
> browsers tend to be somewhat circumspect in what they send there. In 
> addition, both Accept: headers and a getUserMediaCapabilities() method 
> would increase the fingerprinting risk.

And the lack of an ability to build useful applications on the platform 
will result in abandoning the browser environment in favor of native 
code that can do what is necessary.

Matthew Kaufman

Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 21:31:18 UTC