Re: PeerConnection Data Channel

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Matthew Kaufman
<matthew.kaufman@skype.net>wrote:

> On 9/2/11 6:52 PM, Justin Uberti wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm far from sold on RTP for this, but since I think we need a sequence
>> number (for congestion control) and a stream id (for demux), it seems we're
>> already halfway there. Will look at the other methods - do you recall if
>> these were mentioned in a public draft or on the mailing list?
>>
>
> There were two IDs... Cary did a presentation at the last meeting and is
> preparing a combined draft.
>
> I believe there was discussion on the list as well from some RTP folks (or
> maybe it was just at the microphone back in Prague?) about why putting data
> in RTP is the wrong thing.
>
>
Thanks, will look. Main concern is how SDES-SRTP works with something
non-RTP. Maybe that isn't supported.