- From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
- Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:57:40 +0100
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- CC: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 9/2/11 6:52 PM, Justin Uberti wrote: > > I'm far from sold on RTP for this, but since I think we need a > sequence number (for congestion control) and a stream id (for demux), > it seems we're already halfway there. Will look at the other methods - > do you recall if these were mentioned in a public draft or on the > mailing list? There were two IDs... Cary did a presentation at the last meeting and is preparing a combined draft. I believe there was discussion on the list as well from some RTP folks (or maybe it was just at the microphone back in Prague?) about why putting data in RTP is the wrong thing. Matthew Kaufman
Received on Friday, 2 September 2011 17:58:04 UTC