W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2011

Re: Moz/Cisco API proposal: multiple connections

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:24:58 +0000 (UTC)
To: Anant Narayanan <anant@mozilla.com>
Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1107252124090.2079@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011, Anant Narayanan wrote:
> 
> There's no reason that the PeerConnection object has to map the 
> underlying ICE negotiation exactly, but even if it does, our 
> PeerConnection factory proposal (PeerListener) allows for a web 
> developer to express his intent to create multiple PeerConnection 
> objects. In other words, it makes it easier for the developer to 
> establish a 1:many stream without having to create each PeerConnection 
> individually.

I'm not convinced it's much easier. Do you have any examples showing what 
a Web app would look like using your proposal to do 1:many so that I can 
compare it with what it would look like with the current spec?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 21:25:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 25 July 2011 21:25:30 GMT