- From: Peter Thatcher via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:03:49 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
As the person who proposed RtpTransceiver in the first place (and offered the alternative name "SdpMline"), I've always viewed the RtpTransceiver as the thing that is there just to deal with SDP. If you aren't dealing with SDP, put the API on the RtpSender or RtpReceiver. That way, in some wonderful future where one can construct RtpSender and RtpReceiver objects without SDP, you don't need RtpTransceivers to exist. -- GitHub Notification of comment by pthatcher Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-encoded-transform/pull/186#issuecomment-1821211581 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2023 16:03:51 UTC