public-webrtc-logs@w3.org from April 2022 by author

Bernard Aboba via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extensions Encryption (cryptex) (#106) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extensions Encryption (cryptex) (#96) (Thursday, 28 April)
• [webrtc-extensions] Pull Request: RTP Header Extensions Encryption (cryptex) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Deprecate audio/video enumeration in getCapabilities in favour of Media Capabilities API (#95) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Should RtcRtpHeaderExtensionCapabilities offer an "enabled" member? (#99) (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Allow having inactive by default codecs (#100) (Saturday, 23 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] The prose around "simulcast envelope" falsely implies that simulcast encodings can never be removed (#2723) (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Meta: So many specs but how to keep track? (#104) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-extensions] Add API for exposing codec HW capabilities (hardwareAccelerated) (#21) (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add API for exposing codec HW capabilities (hardwareAccelerated) (#21) (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-extensions] WebRTC-Extensions Implementation Status (#80) (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] WebRTC-Extensions Implementation Status (#80) (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Deprecate audio/video enumeration in getCapabilities in favour of Media Capabilities API (#95) (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-extensions] Should we remove extensions marked at risk? (#103) (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Should we remove extensions marked at risk? (#103) (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [webrtc-extensions] Pull Request: Created removed features section (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: [webrtc-svc] Encoding parameters for spatial layers (#14) (Tuesday, 5 April)

Brad Isbell via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100) (Thursday, 7 April)

Danilo Bargen via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Disabling hardware acceleration (#98) (Thursday, 7 April)

docfaraday via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] The prose around "simulcast envelope" falsely implies that simulcast encodings can never be removed (#2723) (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] sRD(offer) completely overwrites pre-existing transceiver.[[Sender]].[[SendEncodings]] (#2722) (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] sRD(offer) completely overwrites pre-existing transceiver.[[Sender]].[[SendEncodings]] (#2722) (Friday, 22 April)
• [webrtc-pc] The language around setting a description appears to prohibit renegotiation of RIDs (#2724) (Friday, 22 April)
• [webrtc-pc] The prose around "simulcast envelope" falsely implies that simulcast encodings can never be removed (#2723) (Friday, 22 April)
• [webrtc-pc] sRD(offer) completely overwrites pre-existing transceiver.[[Sender]].[[SendEncodings]] (#2722) (Friday, 22 April)

Domenic Denicola via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Thursday, 28 April)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub

• [mst-content-hint] Pull Request: Improve markup of enumeration tables (Thursday, 28 April)
• [webrtc-priority] Pull Request: Improve markup of enumeration tables (Thursday, 28 April)
• [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Improve markup of enumeration tables (Thursday, 28 April)
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Improve markup of enumeration tables (Thursday, 28 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Improve markup of enumeration tables (Thursday, 28 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Improve markup of enumeration tables (Thursday, 28 April)
• Closed: [mediacapture-main] Replace usage of "responsible document" (#871) (Monday, 25 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to ReSpec version 32.1.4 (Monday, 25 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Fix definitions to make respec happy (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Meta: So many specs but how to keep track? (#104) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-transform] How to handle varying pixel formats (#83) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Update to latest ReSpec version 32.1.2 (#875) (Thursday, 14 April)
• [webrtc-charter] Pull Request: Document proposed call for adoption process (Wednesday, 6 April)
• [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Enable TR shortname (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Repo is broken :-) (#43) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Closed: [mediacapture-region] Repo is broken :-) (#43) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-charter] Pull Request: New specs (Tuesday, 5 April)
• [webrtc-charter] Pull Request: Add link to WebTransport WG in dependencies (Tuesday, 5 April)
• [webrtc-charter] Pull Request: Align with latest version of charter template (Tuesday, 5 April)
• [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Set up for automatic update of TR version (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Advance document to FPWD (#38) (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Advance document to FPWD (#38) (Monday, 4 April)
• [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Markup definitions to make them reusable in other specs (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Update to latest ReSpec version 32.1.2 (#875) (Monday, 4 April)
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Replace usage of "responsible document" (Monday, 4 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to ReSpec version 32.1.2 (Monday, 4 April)
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version 32.1.2 (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Fix ReSpec - conformance section (#39) (Friday, 1 April)

Elad Alon via GitHub

• [mediacapture-screen-share] Allow applications to opt-out of source-change (#223) (Friday, 29 April)
• [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Introduce DisplayMediaStreamConstraints.systemAudio (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should Identity and Actions be in separate repos? (#38) (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid user-confusion by not offering undesired audio sources (#219) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid user-confusion by not offering undesired audio sources (#219) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid user-confusion by not offering undesired audio sources (#219) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Consider exposing screen share state to websites. (#220) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Consider exposing screen share state to websites. (#220) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18) (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Consider exposing screen share state to websites. (#220) (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Consider exposing screen share state to websites. (#220) (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Consider exposing screen share state to websites. (#220) (Monday, 25 April)
• [mediacapture-handle] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#52) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Fix inaccurate definition around browsing contexts (#41) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Spec-hooks requested (#213) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-handle] Specify requirement of exposure: tab-capture (#44) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-handle] CaptureHandleChangeEvent should just be Event (#50) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Define DisplayMediaStreamConstraints.selfBrowserSurface (#216) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Repo is broken :-) (#43) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-handle] Specify requirement of exposure: tab-capture (#44) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid user-confusion by not offering undesired audio sources (#219) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-handle] Specify requirement of exposure: tab-capture (#44) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-handle] Specify requirement of exposure: tab-capture (#44) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• [mediacapture-region] Repo is broken :-) (#43) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Closed: [mediacapture-region] Is BrowserCaptureMediaStreamTrack needed? (#10) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Spec-hooks requested (#213) (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Define DisplayMediaStreamConstraints.currentTabPreference (#216) (Monday, 4 April)
• [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Update capture-handle-actions.js (Monday, 4 April)
• [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Update capture-handle-identity.js (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Advance document to FPWD (#38) (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Advance document to FPWD (#38) (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Fix inaccurate definition around browsing contexts (#41) (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Fix inaccurate definition around browsing contexts (#41) (Friday, 1 April)
• [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Fix inaccurate definition around browsing contexts (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Spec erroneously limits self-capture to same-document/iframe (#40) (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Fix ReSpec - conformance section (#39) (Friday, 1 April)

Eric Carlson via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Prevent unintentional leaks (#220) (Wednesday, 27 April)

Florent Castelli via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Deprecate audio/video enumeration in getCapabilities in favour of Media Capabilities API (#95) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove outbound-rtp.rtxSsrc. (#624) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove sctp-transport (#627) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: [webrtc-svc] Encoding parameters for spatial layers (#14) (Tuesday, 5 April)

Harald Alvestrand via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] transport: add dtlsRole (#629) (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Should we remove extensions marked at risk? (#103) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Spec-hooks requested (#213) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should Application surface be removed (#189) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Move unimplemented stats to webrtc-provisional-stats (#621) (Thursday, 7 April)

henbos via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-stats] transport: add dtlsRole (#629) (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] transport: add dtlsRole (#629) (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove sctp-transport (#627) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Map out implementation status of getStats and make a plan (#595) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove most unimplemented stats (#622) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Move unimplemented stats to webrtc-provisional-stats (#621) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Move unimplemented stats to webrtc-provisional-stats (#621) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove sender, receiver and transceiver. (#628) (Thursday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Remove sender, receiver and transceiver. (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove most unimplemented stats (#622) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove most unimplemented stats (#622) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove outbound-rtp.rid (#623) (Thursday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Remove sctp-transport (Thursday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Remove remote-inbound-rtp.packetsDiscarded. (Thursday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Remove transport.rtcpTransportStatsId (Thursday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Remove outbound-rtp.rtxSsrc. (Thursday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Remove outbound-rtp.rid (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove most unimplemented stats (#622) (Thursday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Remove most unimplemented stats (Thursday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Move unimplemented stats to webrtc-provisional-stats (#621) (Thursday, 7 April)

Ian Denhardt via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.addIceCandidate(). (#81) (Saturday, 23 April)

Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] sRD(offer) completely overwrites pre-existing transceiver.[[Sender]].[[SendEncodings]] (#2722) (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Meta: So many specs but how to keep track? (#104) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Update to latest ReSpec version 32.1.2 (#875) (Thursday, 14 April)
• Closed: [mediacapture-region] Spec erroneously limits self-capture to same-document/iframe (#40) (Thursday, 14 April)
• Closed: [mediacapture-handle] Tab capture restriction (#43) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-handle] Specify requirement of exposure: tab-capture (#44) (Thursday, 7 April)
• [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Add notes documenting outstanding issues. (Wednesday, 6 April)
• [mediacapture-handle] CaptureHandleChangeEvent should just be Event (#50) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-handle] Specify requirement of exposure: tab-capture (#44) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: s/Legal values/Valid values/ (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Fix inaccurate definition around browsing contexts (#41) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Clarify browser display-surface is top-level viewport (Friday, 1 April)
• [mediacapture-region] Spec erroneously limits self-capture to same-document/iframe (#40) (Friday, 1 April)

Lenny via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Meta: So many specs but how to keep track? (#104) (Thursday, 21 April)
• [webrtc-extensions] Meta: So many specs but how to keep track? (#104) (Thursday, 7 April)

Max Solodovnikov via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove most unimplemented stats (#622) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove outbound-rtp.rid (#623) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove outbound-rtp.rid (#623) (Thursday, 7 April)

Michiel Westerbeek via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Conditional Focus (When Display-Capture Starts) (#190) (Friday, 8 April)

NDevTK via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Prevent unintentional leaks (#220) (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Consider exposing screen share state to websites. (#220) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Consider exposing screen share state to websites. (#220) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Consider exposing screen share state to websites. (#220) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• [mediacapture-screen-share] Consider exposing screen share state to websites. (#220) (Sunday, 24 April)

Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-record] Remove superfluous MediaRecorderErrorEvent interface (#212) (Monday, 4 April)

Philipp Hancke via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Allow having inactive by default codecs (#100) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] Allow having inactive by default codecs (#100) (Saturday, 23 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] sRD(offer) completely overwrites pre-existing transceiver.[[Sender]].[[SendEncodings]] (#2722) (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] sRD(offer) completely overwrites pre-existing transceiver.[[Sender]].[[SendEncodings]] (#2722) (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] transport: add dtlsRole (#629) (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] transport: add dtlsRole (#629) (Thursday, 21 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: transport: add dtlsRole (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove most unimplemented stats (#622) (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Make generateKeyFrame take a single RID or none. Resolve the promise with the frame timestamp (#132) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove most unimplemented stats (#622) (Thursday, 7 April)

plepisnew via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-record] How to fix 2-N video tracks of concatenated Blobs of media recording not rendering playback? (#132) (Thursday, 14 April)

Sean DuBois via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-stats] Move unimplemented stats to webrtc-provisional-stats (#621) (Thursday, 7 April)

Varun Singh via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-svc] Encoding parameters for spatial layers (#14) (Tuesday, 5 April)

W3C Bot via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-stats] transport: add dtlsRole (#629) (Friday, 22 April)

youennf via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid user-confusion by not offering undesired audio sources (#219) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Consider exposing screen share state to websites. (#220) (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-transform] How to handle varying pixel formats (#83) (Thursday, 21 April)
• [mediacapture-transform] How to handle varying pixel formats (#83) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Make generateKeyFrame take a single RID or none. Resolve the promise with the frame timestamp (#132) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Spec-hooks requested (#213) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Define DisplayMediaStreamConstraints.currentTabPreference (#216) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Define DisplayMediaStreamConstraints.currentTabPreference (#216) (Thursday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-extensions] Should we remove extensions marked at risk? (#103) (Thursday, 7 April)
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Add back Initialize the underlying source algorithm as it is needed for transferring a MediaStreamTrack (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Make generateKeyFrame take a single RID or none. Resolve the promise with the frame timestamp (#132) (Thursday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: Make generateKeyFrame take a single RID or none. Resolve the promise with the frame timestamp (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [mediacapture-region] Fix inaccurate definition around browsing contexts (#41) (Tuesday, 5 April)

Zombo via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-fromelement] HTML Media Element captureStream() should avoid protected/encrypted content (#20) (Sunday, 3 April)

Last message date: Friday, 29 April 2022 18:27:53 UTC