Re: [webrtc-pc] Recycling an m= section may not remove the old transceiver's remote track from its stream

> It may be safer to process the removal in SLD(answer) (so, "step 4" in the original issue description).

You mean keep SRD(offer) as is, and add removal for this edge-case in SLD(answer)? I think I agree.

Worst case: where a newly offered transceiver is rejected, its announced track should still be muted anyway, so the redundant `track`, `addtrack`, `removetrack` and `ended` events hopefully won't cause visible harm.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by jan-ivar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1778#issuecomment-374816408 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2018 02:13:37 UTC