public-webrtc-logs@w3.org from April 2017 by author

Adam Bergkvist via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] FrozenArray, sequence and SameObject (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Drop [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] for USVString (Tuesday, 18 April)

adamroach via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Monday, 3 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Monday, 3 April)

Anne van Kesteren via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] Make RTCDataChannels Transferable (Wednesday, 19 April)

Bernard Aboba via GitHub

• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 27 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 27 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] "Callback definitions" section should go under "legacy interface extensions" (Thursday, 27 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 27 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 27 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Define what the default RTCDataChannel id is (Thursday, 27 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 27 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] "track" event fires while MediaStream has a partial list of tracks. (Thursday, 27 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 27 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Add a link to web-platform-tests to the top of the spec (Thursday, 27 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Revert: pranswer as a "feature atrisk" (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Mark Provisional Answer as a feature at risk? (Thursday, 20 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 20 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] is not allowed for USVString per Web IDL (Thursday, 20 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 20 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm for implicitly generated local certificates (Thursday, 20 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm() wording and serialization (Thursday, 20 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 20 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 20 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Conformance section (Wednesday, 19 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Algorithm to mute/disable tracks is unclear (Tuesday, 18 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Algorithm to mute/disable tracks is unclear (Thursday, 13 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 13 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Make legacy API optional to implement (Thursday, 13 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Section 12.2.4: Note (Thursday, 13 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 13 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpContributingSource.getReceiver() (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpContributingSource.getReceiver() (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Making legacy methods optional to implement. (Thursday, 13 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Section 12.2.4: Remove Note (Thursday, 13 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Mark Identity as feature at risk? (Thursday, 13 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Conformance section (Thursday, 13 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 13 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Update for structured cloning changes in HTML (Thursday, 13 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 13 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpContributingSource.audioLevel not guaranteed to be in sync with audio playout (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm for implicitly generated local certificates (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] "getParameters" and "setParameters" need more thorough specification (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm() wording and serialization (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] "getParameters" and "setParameters" need more thorough specification (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] "getParameters" and "setParameters" need more thorough specification (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] "getParameters" and "setParameters" need more thorough specification (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Handling of simulcast errors (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Section 12.2.4: Note (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] DTLS failures (Friday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: DTLS failures (Friday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Mark Identity as a feature at risk (Friday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Adding configurable "ptime" member of RTCRtpEncodingParameters. (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Eliminate NetworkError (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] DTLS failures (Wednesday, 5 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Mark pranswer as a "feature atrisk" (Wednesday, 5 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Tuesday, 4 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Section 12.2.1.1: enum errorDetail definition (Monday, 3 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Mark Provisional Answer as a feature at risk? (Monday, 3 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Diagram for RTCSignalingState includes "closed" state, which doesn't exist? (Monday, 3 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] I think that "gatheringState" of RTCIceTransport should be changed to the name "gathererState". (Monday, 3 April)

Cullen Jennings via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] DTLS failures (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Always update the RTCRtpContributingSource for SSRCs. (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Add missing "closed" signaling state. (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Section 12.2.1.1: RTCErrorDetailType Enum definition (Tuesday, 4 April)

Daniel Burnett via GitHub

• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by burnburn (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Making legacy methods optional to implement. (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Attempt to update RTCRtpContributingSource objects at playout time. (Tuesday, 4 April)

Domenic Denicola via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] FrozenArray, sequence and SameObject (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Update structured cloning for recent changes to HTML (Monday, 10 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update structured cloning for recent changes to HTML (Tuesday, 4 April)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] Conformance section (Wednesday, 19 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] is not allowed for USVString per Web IDL (Tuesday, 18 April)

ekr via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] Mark pranswer as a "feature atrisk" (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Mark pranswer as a "feature atrisk" (Friday, 7 April)

gtk2k via GitHub

• [webrtc-pc] I think that "gatheringState" of RTCIceTransport should be changed to the name "gathererState". (Sunday, 2 April)

guidou via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] is not allowed for USVString per Web IDL (Tuesday, 18 April)

Hadley Beeman via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-stats] Privacy & Security self review (Thursday, 27 April)

Harald Alvestrand via GitHub

• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Diagram for RTCSignalingState includes "closed" state, which doesn't exist? (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] DTLS failures (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Make legacy API optional to implement (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Handling of simulcast errors (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Need to specify which members of the encodings in "sendEncodings" are actually used (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpContributingSource naming (Thursday, 6 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] NetworkError event is not defined and might not be needed (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Always update the RTCRtpContributingSource for SSRCs. (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Describe update strategy on variables (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 6 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] When exactly is an SSRC RTCRtpContributingSource object updated? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Attempt to update RTCRtpContributingSource objects at playout time. (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 6 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] get/setParameters does not have a parameter for packetization interval (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpContributingSource naming (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCMediaStreamTrackStats.audioLevel clarification (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] example 8.2: calculating fraction lost vs fractionLost stat (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] Clarify if stat object's members can change after having been returned (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCCodecStats needs `transportId` and `isRemote` to give it context (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] mediaTrackId field missing a description (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] mediaTrackId field missing a description (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Update example to match webrtc spec's + senders.getStats. (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Refactor out isRemote. (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Reuse of "inbound-rtp" and "outbound-rtp" for RTCP is confusing. (Monday, 3 April)

henbos via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-stats] Adding "codec type" and transportId to RTCCodecStats. (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Adding "codec type" and transportId to RTCCodecStats. (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] FrozenArray, sequence and SameObject (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCMediaStreamTrackStats.concealedAudioSamples (Wednesday, 26 April)
• [webrtc-stats] RTCMediaStreamTrackStats.concealedAudioSamples (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCIceCandidatePairStats.lastResponseTimestamp (Wednesday, 26 April)
• [webrtc-stats] RTCIceCandidatePairStats.lastResponseTimestamp (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] FrozenArray, sequence and SameObject (Tuesday, 25 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: FrozenArray, sequence and SameObject (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Split getContributingSources into two methods, for CSRCs and SSRCs. (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm() to return a compatible AlgorithmIdentifier. (Wednesday, 19 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCIceCandidatePairStats: Remove writable/readable, add consentExpiredTimestamp (Tuesday, 18 April)
• [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by henbos (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] RTCTransportStats packet counters (Tuesday, 18 April)
• [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by henbos (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] RTCIceCandidatePairStats packet counters (Tuesday, 18 April)
• [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by henbos (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] Stat for camera input framerate of local video tracks (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Drop [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] for USVString (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarify that configuration.certificates remains undefined in the RTCPeerConnection constructor. (Tuesday, 18 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clarify that configuration.certificates remains undefined in the RTCPeerConnection constructor. (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm() to return a compatible AlgorithmIdentifier. (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm for implicitly generated local certificates (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm() to return a compatible AlgorithmIdentifier. (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm for implicitly generated local certificates (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm for implicitly generated local certificates (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm() to return a compatible AlgorithmIdentifier. (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm() to return a compatible AlgorithmIdentifier. (Wednesday, 12 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm() to return a compatible AlgorithmIdentifier. (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm for implicitly generated local certificates (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Adding "codec type" and transportId to RTCCodecStats. (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Adding RTCRTPContributingSourceStats stats report object. (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm() wording and serialization (Tuesday, 11 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: RTCMediaStreamTrackStats: framesCaptured added. (Tuesday, 11 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: RTCIceCandidatePairStats: packetsSent/Received added. (Tuesday, 11 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: RTCTransportStats: packetsSent/Received added. (Tuesday, 11 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: RTCIceCandidatePairStats: Update writable, remove readable (Tuesday, 11 April)
• [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm() wording and serialization (Tuesday, 11 April)
• [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm for remote certificates (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpContributingSource.getReceiver() (Friday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpContributingSource.getReceiver() (Friday, 7 April)

Iñaki Baz Castillo via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] does MSID still work? (was: example 13: getReceivers semantics) (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Need to specify which members of the encodings in "sendEncodings" are actually used (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Thursday, 13 April)

jan-ivar via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-stats] Added RTCInboundRTPStreamStats sample counters. (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Wednesday, 19 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Saturday, 15 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Mark Identity as a "feature atrisk" (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Added RTCInboundRTPStreamStats sample counters. (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Refactor out isRemote. (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Refactor out isRemote. (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Refactor out isRemote. (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] getStats example is outdated and redundant. (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Reuse of "inbound-rtp" and "outbound-rtp" for RTCP is confusing. (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Refactor out isRemote. (Monday, 3 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Update example to match webrtc spec's + senders.getStats. (Monday, 3 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] New 'remote-inbound-rtp' + 'remote-outbound-rtp' (refactor out isRemote) (Monday, 3 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] New 'remote-inbound-rtp' + 'remote-outbound-rtp' (refactor out isRemote) (Monday, 3 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: New 'remote-inbound-rtp' + 'remote-outbound-rtp' (refactor out isRemote) (Monday, 3 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Reuse of "inbound-rtp" and "outbound-rtp" for RTCP is confusing. (Monday, 3 April)

jianjunz via GitHub

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add link to iceRestart. (Friday, 28 April)

kumavis via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] Make RTCDataChannels Transferable (Wednesday, 19 April)

na-g via GitHub

• [webrtc-stats] RTCMediaStreamTrackStats.audioLevel clarification (Wednesday, 5 April)

Nils Ohlmeier via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Thursday, 13 April)

Peter Thatcher via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Tuesday, 4 April)

Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] FrozenArray, sequence and SameObject (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Tuesday, 25 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Remove space before commas (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Adding more detail about RTCDataChannel.id's default value (null). (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] "Firing an RTCTrackEvent event named e" is never referenced (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Monday, 24 April)
• [webrtc-pc] "Firing an RTCTrackEvent event named e" is never referenced (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Add a link to web-platform-tests to the top of the spec (Friday, 21 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add a link to web-platform-tests to the top of the spec (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Call RTCDtlsFingerprint a dictionary, not an object (Friday, 21 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Call RTCDtlsFingerprint a dictionary, not an object (Friday, 21 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Use [SameObject] for the FrozenArray<T> attributes that never change (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Define what the default RTCDataChannel id is (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Drop [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] for USVString (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Define what the default RTCDataChannel id is (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Drop [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] for USVString (Wednesday, 19 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Define what the default RTCDataChannel id is (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Drop [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] for USVString (Tuesday, 18 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Drop [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] for USVString (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] is not allowed for USVString per Web IDL (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Make legacy API optional to implement (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Make legacy API optional to implement (Tuesday, 11 April)
• [webrtc-pc] [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] is not allowed for USVString per Web IDL (Tuesday, 11 April)

Philipp Hancke via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] does MSID still work? (was: example 13: getReceivers semantics) (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] does MSID still work? (was: example 13: getReceivers semantics) (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] move legacy callback definitions to legacy section (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] "Callback definitions" section should go under "legacy interface extensions" (Monday, 24 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: move legacy callback definitions to legacy section (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Tuesday, 18 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: examples: dont fiddle with srcObject if already set (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Monday, 17 April)
• [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Mark Provisional Answer as a feature at risk? (Monday, 3 April)

Roman Shpount via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Monday, 3 April)

stefan hakansson via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] FrozenArray, sequence and SameObject (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Revert: pranswer as a "feature atrisk" (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Specify an AllowUnverifiedMedia RTCConfiguration property (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Mark pranswer as a "feature atrisk" (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] examples: dont fiddle with srcObject if already set (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpContributingSource naming (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Mark pranswer as a "feature atrisk" (Wednesday, 19 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Section 12.2.4: Remove Note (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpContributingSource.getReceiver() (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm for implicitly generated local certificates (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm() to return a compatible AlgorithmIdentifier. (Thursday, 13 April)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by stefhak (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Update structured cloning for recent changes to HTML (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm() to return a compatible AlgorithmIdentifier. (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Mark pranswer as a "feature atrisk" (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Make legacy API optional to implement (Tuesday, 11 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Making legacy methods optional to implement. (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Mark pranswer as a "feature atrisk" (Sunday, 9 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Specify an AllowUnverifiedMedia RTCConfiguration property (Saturday, 1 April)

Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub

• [webrtc-pc] How do applications know a DataChannel's buffer capacity, so they can avoid filling it? (Saturday, 29 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] does MSID still work? (was: example 13: getReceivers semantics) (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Adding "codec type" and transportId to RTCCodecStats. (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Adding "codec type" and transportId to RTCCodecStats. (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] "Callback definitions" section should go under "legacy interface extensions" (Monday, 24 April)
• [webrtc-pc] "Callback definitions" section should go under "legacy interface extensions" (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Monday, 24 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Adding more detail about RTCDataChannel.id's default value (null). (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] examples: dont fiddle with srcObject if already set (Thursday, 20 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fire the "track" event from a queued task. (Thursday, 20 April)
• [webrtc-pc] "track" event fires while MediaStream has a partial list of tracks. (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] examples: dont fiddle with srcObject if already set (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Define what the default RTCDataChannel id is (Thursday, 20 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Specify which encoding parameters can be set through sendEncodings. (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Split getContributingSources into two methods, for CSRCs and SSRCs. (Thursday, 20 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Split getContributingSources into two methods, for CSRCs and SSRCs. (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Wednesday, 19 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm() to return a compatible AlgorithmIdentifier. (Wednesday, 19 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Define what the default RTCDataChannel id is (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm for implicitly generated local certificates (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] examples: dont fiddle with srcObject if already set (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Describe update strategy on variables (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Attempt to update RTCRtpContributingSource objects at playout time. (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm for implicitly generated local certificates (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] "getParameters" and "setParameters" need more thorough specification (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCCertificate.getAlgorithm for implicitly generated local certificates (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] "getParameters" and "setParameters" need more thorough specification (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] "getParameters" and "setParameters" need more thorough specification (Saturday, 8 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] "getParameters" and "setParameters" need more thorough specification (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] DTLS failures (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Describe update strategy on variables (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpContributingSource.getReceiver() (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Handling of simulcast errors (Friday, 7 April)
• [webrtc-pc] "getParameters" and "setParameters" need more thorough specification (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Need to specify which members of the encodings in "sendEncodings" are actually used (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Attempt to update RTCRtpContributingSource objects at playout time. (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Terminology around "setting" attributes may be incorrect (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Describe update strategy on variables (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpContributingSource naming (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Always update the RTCRtpContributingSource for SSRCs. (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Handling of simulcast errors (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Adding RTCRTPContributingSourceStats stats report object. (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Attempt to update RTCRtpContributingSource objects at playout time. (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] strawman text to show how unverified media would work (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCCodecStats needs `transportId` and `isRemote` to give it context (Wednesday, 5 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Adding configurable "ptime" member of RTCRtpEncodingParameters. (Tuesday, 4 April)

Varun Singh via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-stats] Explain DomHighResTimestamp once in the introduction. (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] What should `availableOutgoingBitrate`/`availableOutgoingBitrate` be for candidate pairs not in use? (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] Design consideration for inactive SSRCs and inactive transports (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] Remove availableIncomingBitrate? (Wednesday, 26 April)
• [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] RTCIceCandidatePairStats.writable/readable: redundant? (Wednesday, 26 April)
• [webrtc-stats] Explain DomHighResTimestamp once in the introduction. (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Adding "codec type" and transportId to RTCCodecStats. (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Refactor out isRemote. (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Added RTCInboundRTPStreamStats sample counters. (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Added RTCInboundRTPStreamStats sample counters. (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Adding "codec type" and transportId to RTCCodecStats. (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Attempt to update RTCRtpContributingSource objects at playout time. (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Added RTCInboundRTPStreamStats sample counters. (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Added RTCInboundRTPStreamStats sample counters. (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] getStats example is outdated and redundant. (Thursday, 6 April)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] example 8.2: calculating fraction lost vs fractionLost stat (Thursday, 6 April)
• [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] getStats example is outdated and redundant. (Tuesday, 4 April)

youennf via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Saturday, 15 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Thursday, 13 April)
• [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API? (Thursday, 13 April)

Last message date: Saturday, 29 April 2017 18:24:36 UTC