- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:55:48 +0000
- To: "public-webrtc-editors@w3.org" <public-webrtc-editors@w3.org>
It would be good to get some traffic on the list on this subject. Perhaps the editors could say something (and if you think it is a bad idea say so too), and hopefully more people would respond if we get some traffic? Stefan -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: Call for Consensus (CfC) to transition “Media Capture and Streams” to Candidate Recommendation Date: 07/04/16 15:31 From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> To: public-webrtc@w3.org <public-webrtc@w3.org> +1 In more words: I support requesting the move to CR for mediacapture-main. On 04/07/2016 02:21 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: > All, > > we think mediacapture-main (developed jointly with the DAP WG in the > Media Capture TF) has been baked enough now to request its > transition to Candidate Recommendation. There are a few open Issues at > [1], but we think they can and will be resolved without any major > changes to the document. > > In accordance with the W3C process requirement to record the > group's decision to request advancement [2], this is a Call for > Consensus (CfC) to request transition to CR for the following document: > > https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-main/ > > Positive responses are encouraged, but if there are no objections by > > *April 17th 2016* > > we will move forward with the transition request. > > Stefan for the chairs > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues > [2] https://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#transition-reqs > -- Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
Received on Monday, 11 April 2016 10:56:21 UTC