Re: ReSpec WebIDL authoring

On 11/05/2015 14:32, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> On 29/04/2015 10:27, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
>> On 24/04/2015 10:32, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>>> Can you file a bug with them (or find a bug to attach to) saying "we
>>> need getter support"?
>>
>> I have instead filed a pull request that adds the necessary support:
>>
>> Hopefully it will be merged soon.
>
> It has been merged, and now the full set of WebIDL fragments of the
> WebRTC spec can be rendered in contiguous mode (see attachment).

I think we lost track of this (moving our spec(s) to WebIDL contiguous 
mode in ReSpec) — should we get back to this? If so, how should we 
proceed? Or is that too much make-work?

Dom

Received on Monday, 17 August 2015 14:59:24 UTC