Re: Notes, April 16

On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:56 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:

> On 04/16/2015 02:09 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>> This is the top of my mind for April 16, please think of other things...
>> 
>> Organizational changes for the editing team:
>> 
>> - Moving the mailing list from alvestrand.no to w3.org, making it open
>> archive
>> - Harald undertakes to send out the top-of-mind message on Wednesday
>> not Thursday :-)
>> 
>> GetUserMedia:
>> 
>> - We will not do anything with getusermedia this week - the comments
>> are coming in, let them rest.
>> - Dom's tracker:
>> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/47318/WD-mediacapture-streams-20150414/
>> - Dom will watch this and update as approprate
> 
> We'll be following up, and going over the list next week. People are
> free to comment, of course!
> 
>> 
>> Webrtc:
>> 
>> Pull requests: 14 open
>> 
>> Goal: By the end of the call, have either pushed the merge button or
>> assigned someone who will commit to getting something to happen by the
>> next call (possibly merge it, possibly by commenting on issues that
>> prevent merging). PRs labelled "list discussion needed" are in a known
>> state, so we don't need to spend time on them (unless we want to).
>> 
>> - None of Martin's pull requests are updated yet. Waiting for Martin,
>> skipping here.
>> - #171 RTCAnswer options: Reassigned to stefan, since he had comments
> VAD is on a track basis, so it doesn't make sense at the SDP-generation
> level.
> Suggest: Raise a new bug to address voice activity detection, and take
> it to the list.
> Just adding (possibly empty) options shouldn't be blocked on that.
> 
>> - #180 editorial fixes: Assigned to Adam - status? (looked reasonable
>> last time)
>> - #181 ensure valid markup: As above
> 
> Basically search/replace PRs. Adam will hit merge once Travis is
> finished, if happy.
> 
>> - #193 .mid property on sender/receiver: Tied up with the whole ID
>> discussion - need to wait?
>> - #195 RTCRtpSender.replaceTrack: Active list discussion, let's wait
>> - #196 Sender.track - entangled in same discussion. Likely close, but
>> let's wait
> 
> These three are tied to the discussion around ReplaceTrack (196 closed).
> Waiting for discussion to resolve.
> 
>> - #206 Harmonizing issue references - style not content. Merge?
> 
> Adam will take a look at it, and merge unless he finds an issue.
> 
>> - #207 ICE config examples update - merge?
> Already merged.
>> - #208 Missing references - merge?
> Already merged.
>> - #210 WebIDL fix for RTCConfiguration (more WebIDL weirdness). Needs
>> to remove the explict throw mentioned in comments too, I think. Assign
>> to Dom?
> 
> The text that is problematic is going to be updated in #211 anyway, so
> looking at it there.
> 
>> - #211 Adam's new updateIce() - comments point at consensus for full
>> replacement - needs update?
> 
> Adam will create a PR to say "setConfiguration sets the configuration,
> no partial change".
> Justin is pinged to comment on the issue.
> 
> 
>> 
>> Issues: 40 open
>> 
>> I've started going through the list and marking with "enhancement"
>> where it involves new functionality (needs a proposal from either the
>> editors or someone else), and "bug" where we can make an edit to fix
>> it without changing models.
>> 
>> Let's go through the "bug" ones if we can, and assign them - either
>> write some text, or prod someone to propose text for you.
>> 
>> Note: A number of bugs are left unlabelled. I found these problematic
>> to classify, because they depend in a convoluted fashion on other
>> ongoing things. Feel free to assign to yourself any bug you want to
>> handle.
> For the "bug" category:
> 
> #21 MUST / must: Dan takes it.
> #35 invalid candiate: Adam
> #139 reasons for muted: Adam - probably the track is unmuted when
> packets arrive. (might have gotten lost when removing the "new" state).
> #140 declaration for error type: Dan - need to make sure we have
> consistent errors.

Not sure how I got assigned this fun one, but I guess that's what I get for having to drop off 10 mins early :)  This is now looking like a more comprehensive change, in both specs perhaps.

> #145 is under control
> #156 is "list discussion needed" - not clear what to do.
> #198 Resolve SetRemote after onaddtrack: Adam will follow up.
> 
> Call ended at 1655.
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2015 19:42:40 UTC