Re: Our position on vendor prefixed css properties

Well, don't clean up everything with a prefix. If they are things still on
or aiming for a standards track they should be kept. However if they are
standardized or in some other status then they need to be removed (and
redirect to the standard if possible.)

In this case it is something for deletion with a redirect. I don't see
where I can grant permissions to people. That may be something that a
Bureaucrat needs to do.


On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Paul Verbeek <paul@webinthehat.com> wrote:

> Could anyone give me the rights to remove a page? I'll clean it up a bit.
> My username is paulv.
>
>
> On 12 March 2014 13:38, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>>  Remove.
>>
>>
>>
>> These were likely left over from the original import of the content on
>> MSDN, where they are appropriate. They don’t really apply to Webplatform
>> docs.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Eliot
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* verbeek.p@gmail.com [mailto:verbeek.p@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul
>> Verbeek
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 12, 2014 1:29 PM
>> *To:* public-webplatform@w3.org
>> *Subject:* Our position on vendor prefixed css properties
>>
>>
>>
>> I was looking through the site and found a few css properties that are
>> vendor-prefixed, like
>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/-ms-radial-gradient.
>>
>>
>>
>> Are we adding are this vendor prefixed pages or removing them? I would go
>> for the latter. Especially in this case because, as far as I know, there
>> was never a stable IE version that had this property.
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul.
>>
>
>